Music Marketing

Is The Tipping Point Toast? Music Marketing Needs To Change…Again

Tipping_point
For the last several years, the concepts laid out in the best selling book "The Tipping Point" have driven marketing campaigns in general and music marketing in particular.  But new studies raise serious questions about the validity of the book’s core theories.

The Tipping Point particularly touted the importance of Influentials – well-connected individuals who amplify trends by sharing their opinions with their social networks.  Just get these trend-setters on board and the rest will follow.  It’s a seductive concept particularly in the viral interconnected world of social MySapce, Facebook, Twitter, imeem and the entire social networking universe.

WHAT IF THE TIPPING POINT GOT IT WRONG?

Merely arguing that influence spreads like a disease isn’t enough, marketing researcher Duncan Watts told Fast Company.
Diseases spread in many different ways…

Some require multiple exposures
and others don’t. Some reward ‘superspreaders’ and others don’t. For
example the SARS virus hit Hong Kong not because the first victim was a
superspreader, but because a doctor mistakenly hooked him up to an
aspirator-ventilating SARS-infected breath into the hospital air.

Duncan_watts Duncan
Watts believes that in the viral world what’s a hit and what isn’t is
far more random than  the Tipping Point would lead us to believe. "If
society is ready to embrace a trend, almost anyone can start one–and
if it isn’t, then almost no one can," Watts concludes. To have a hit product or band is less about finding the Influentials and more about of gauging the public’s mood. There will
always be a "first mover" with any trend. But according to Watts, they generally stumble
into that role by chance – in Watts’s terminology, they become an
"accidental Influential."

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR MUSIC?

This is sobering stuff for music promotion and marketing. The industry has known for years that no amount of money can create a real hit or a career that lasts. Perhaps the future of the music industry is less about telling consumers what’s hot and more about listening to what fans are telling us they want to hear.

Share on:

4 Comments

  1. I tend to agree. Word of mouth can’t be faked or invented… which is what “influencing the influencer” tends to imply. That isn’t to say that a marketer can’t give people good tools and REMARKABLE stories. But finding the person who really gives a rats butt about your story is the trick. Who is the person who really cares? That is the person most likey to influence their friends and who’s opinion is likely to be taken seriously. Remember that over 80% of real word of mouth is talked about in person and on the phone. http://www.womma.org

  2. Great post Bruce.
    It causes me to think about how the CDC monitors health data information for outbreaks and trends. If a virus is spreading, the CDC can see it happening graphically. Acting upon the data is an entirely different challenge. It seems like that’s where the battle will be won or lost in music?

  3. I would definitely recommend the old Kevin Kelly article, Information as a Communicable Disease. He was, as per usual, ahead of the curve on this one, by decades.
    It’s wild to see this pop up on Hypebot, I’m working on an article on this exact topic today. Thanks for the helpful input.

  4. A big part of the problem is that Malcolm Gladwell is working with a metaphor without understanding the underlying science of complex systems.
    Actually, though I haven’t read the Kevin Kelly article mentioned by “Thirtyseven”, Kelly knows the science and I’ll be looking for that.
    I think I’ll take another at his New Rules for the New Economy as well which others may also find useful even though it’s from 1998.

Comments are closed.