« Walmart Shutting Down DRM Download Servers | Main | mSpot Signs Up 6M For Paid Mobile Entertainment »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Captain Wrong

I've been a long time supporter of eMusic over here, but I think this is a bad move. On the eMusic boards, longtime subscribers are freaking! Not happy at all. While the consumer cost will still be less than iTunes or Amazon, many people note this discourages the risk taking which is part of the charm of eMusic. Also, I think this is going to be difficult to justify as the people there are there for the indie labels and don't care as much for mainstream stuff. On the flip side, the people who are looking for Britney's new single aren't going to do a subscription plan. I've been with eMusic for a long time, but I think this is going to be like iTunes' new $1.29 price point. It is going to cost them sales and the extra revenue isn't going to make up the slack.

Captain Wrong

Oh and as a long time subscriber, this may push me away. I'm on an annual plan that doesn't renew until late October, so I'll have a chance to test drive the new eMusic. I just don't know if it's going to be worth it for me. If the new Napster worked on a Mac or Spotify was in the US, this decision would be a lot harder...


I've been an emusic subscriber for a few years, and I think I am jumping ship when my subscription expires. The appeal of the service to me is the cost. I put up with the limited inventory (even of indie label material) and monthly download deadlines, because it is a good deal. The profit, as I understand it, in the subscription system is based on some people not downloading all of their tracks in a particular month. At the higher prices, I'll go back to buying used CDs on Amazon, Ebay and elsewhere and only buy what I really want, ripping them, and either keeping the cds or selling them. Others will just resort to illegal downloads. The subscription model doesn't work for me at the higher price point.


I'll try it for a month or two. They need to lure the larger indies back though.

Joshua Street

From an Indie Label stand point, I like eMusic, but I don't like this move at all. This is the Majors way of tapping the indie market and lure customers away from solid Indies. It seems to be a back room deal in which Sony is getting a better deal than Independent Labels. However I also feel like this could be a good thing for people offering other creative ways of getting music through subscription.

Frank Hecker

I've posted a roundup of the new prices at http://swindleeeee.com/2009/06/02/new-emusic-us-pricing/ (based on options offered to new subscribers and to me as a current subscriber). The price increases will really hit long-time eMusic users (many of whom have grandfathered plans from before previous price increases) and heavy eMusic users (who are facing at least 50-65% price increases).

By the way, I just checked, and eMusic is currently offering 45 free downloads for new subscribers signing up for the new plans.

Frank Hecker

I should also add that $0.40 per track seems to be the new floor for eMusic prices. I can't find any published eMusic plan that offers a lower per-track price.


David Pakman wouldn't let it happen. Didiom now looks like a great alternative for price sensitive indie fans. They have a huge indie catalog and they let you bid on 1.5 million MP3s. A very cool model.



Very sad. I have no interest in major label pablum. This may be the end of my many years with emusic.

Why not two subscriptions?
One old-school model, keeping the older pricing and only allowing access to the participating labels.
Another "mindless formulaic disposable noise" model, which would allow access to the major labels (Sony etc) at the higher prices.

Let the customer decide.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Musician & Music Industry Resources