Streaming

Why So Many New Music Services Fail

Million-mediaGuest post by Neil Cartwright, Managing Director, Million Media.

I've spent ten years licensing new music services and yet there are still only 3 music services acheiving discernable success: iTunes, Amazon & Spotify. Why do most music services fail? The reasons require understanding of two principles:

  1. How the general population is divided in to fans of music
  2. How new trends spread

If you look at the UK population as a whole it is a surprising fact that more people are indifferent to music than are passionate about it. In fact, most people merely follow music than actively participate.

 

Passionate-1

To be classed as Passionate you have to be actively involved in music, either play an instrument, write about it, work in the industry, go to gigs on a regular basis, read blogs or magazines or DJ. So, artists, managers, people who work in labels, promoters, journalists, store managers, studio owners and bloggers fall in this category. If you're reading this now the chances are you fall in to the passionate audience. The critical point to understand is you will likely be an influencer on your network of friends. Your non-music friends will look to you for guidance on everything to do with music, from who is going to be the next big thing, to where to buy music. You probably introduced to them to new artists – especially if you are a radio DJ, a journalist or music programmer for a festival or TV show. However, you probably introduced them to iTunes and Spotify too.

 

The second concept for music services to understand is how a trend, or brand, is spread via word-of -mouth. This principle was described expertly by Malcolm Gladwell in his seminal book, The Tipping Point. In it he describes with precision how a trend is spread by people he terms, 'Mavens', 'Connectors' and 'Salesmen'. These are people who are considered by their personal network to be experts in their field. In our case, this field is music, which as we have seen, will likely mean they are passionate music fans.

 

Passionate-2

 

Now we have our two concepts we can ask the question, how to appeal to an audience who are passionate about music? Well, you must recognise the crucial fact that success is based on appealing to the 12% of the population classed as 'Passionate', at least initially. Therefore, what you don't do is make the mistake most services make, which is sign a deal with the four Majors and think of signing the 'Indies' as an afterthought. The Majors may have most of the content that appeals to the Casual music audience – mainstream, chart filler. But the Passionate audience has a wider taste that will consist of a far higher percentage of indie and eclectic content. Second, if you launch with an artist promotion, such as an exclusive release, then an act like Rihanna, Beyonce, Eminem, etc may grab headlines but does little to appeal to the Passionate audience.

To launch a service is much like breaking a new artist – it takes time. Record labels know that even a huge marketing spend is not the way to break an artist unless you first have the 'Tastemakers' on side. Time is spent building word of mouth through showcases, plugging, promotion and marketing to the small group of influential passionate fans. In the same way, a new music service should focus on building fans in this group. This could include promoting music from developing artists; not with the goal of selling lots of downloads but rather to appeal to the passionate audience. Promoting gigs in smaller venues or advertising on specialist blogs would help build the perception amongst fans that the service is more interested in 'music' than 'sales'. Finally, free accounts to bloggers, DJ's or music journalists would help build a connection with the vital 'Mavens'.

Unfortunately, the nature of big brands is to want to build brand awareness amongst the largest market sector who buy music (the Casuals) rather than the smallest (the passionates).

Share on:

7 Comments

  1. Interesting article.
    One other thing to note about passionate music lovers, is there is quite a big overlap between those who are involved in the digital side of music and those involved in technology. For a new music service it is these people, even more so than the straight up passionate music lovers, that can be useful.
    They are the people that enjoy being in the first alpha/beta trials of new services and have the knowledge to provide feedback on more of the service than the breadth of music available. They also might talk to other more pure technology evangelists who could spread the word further in that direction.

  2. Come to JesBus,,,,,,,,,,it’s the old 80/20 rule The new sites have set their sights on the worst aspect of it. #1 they aim to please the majors or the 20 percent producers; meanwhile leaving the 80 percenters alone to graze across the multi-expanding digital pastures. To boot! The despite all the hand-ringing about the death of CD’s they too are still the majority of sales let alone vinyl –which I’ll now say tops 7% precent as more US MUSIC STORES carry it. IMHO This is the very reason that INgrooves acquired, Fontana and Orchard/Iota poached the top sales staff of a certain onestop. Gotta have both BRICKS and CLICKS distribution solution in 2012
    BTW From my time in the distribution I’ve seen the industry shun the internetwork, declare it everything and then embrase the fact that fans want Clicks and Bricks solutions and mergers are happening so fast no one can keep up with who owns what catalog. However at the same time the “technology” that has come to market in each in every case thinks that it will replace the “record business” with their app, site or wigit
    Might I suggest to the next company or one that is out there trying to figure out why their stand alone solution is not being embraced by all those Record Execs. How about approaching one of the companies (most are at NARM.com convention ) and saying our solution with your solution will be amazing. It’s just a thought.

  3. While I agree with many points here and above, I just want it known that I am not the Nelson that wrote the response.
    Keep up the good work, peeps.

  4. I was hoping that this article would explain why there are so many music service sites like this one (and ReverbNation, and SonicBids, and BandCamp, etc.). Do we really need more?

  5. At least Neil is commenting on why services fail from a market point of view. The short answer is lack of positioning – which is essentially marketing 101 for all fmcg and consumer brands that are worth their salt.
    Most commentary we read on this is about the industry structure – licensing, deals, costs, relationships and bad partnership. True, those issues exist.
    But – the propositions and marketing really could be better. Just because you can code an app doesn’t mean there is a service really solving a problem for the fan.

  6. eMusic focused on the indies and that strategy didn’t work for them. You have to have both indies and majors, I’m afraid, or you are marginalized. The bigger problem with music services is they are not feeding the passionate music fan in all of us. For all the personalization/recommendation and social/sticky doo-dads, the experience on these services makes the user do the bulk of the work in finding music they love, or will probably love.

Comments are closed.