NEWS BRIEF: iTunes Preps 10th, PROs Accused Of Retitling Songs, Apple Adds 'Download Later' & More
Chirpify Adds $2 Million In Funding, Signs Lil Wayne, Snoop Dogg & Puma For In-Stream Social Commerce

N.Y. Court Rules Against Grooveshark In Universal Music Battle

image from www.grooveshark.comIn a major blow to Grooveshark, a five judge panel of the New York Supreme Court’s appellate division ruled that music recorded prior to 1972 was not covered by safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Under Safe Harbor, sites are not liable for users' infringement, as long as they remove pirated material at the content owner's request.

Earlier, a state trial court had ruled against Universal on pre-192 recordings. Yesterday the appeals court based its new decision on the portion of the Copyright Act that says the DMCA doesn't “annul” or “limit” common law copyright protections for sound recordings prior to 1972.

The New York judges also noted that their decision conflicts with a 2011 ruling, Capitol Records vs. MP3tunes, that said that DMCA did extend to works before 1972. While Grooveshark says it will appeal today's decisions, it also creates a new headaches for many sites including YouTube who allow users to upload music. 

Can Grooveshark Continue?

The larger underlying lawsuit between Universal and Grooveshark also remains unresolved, as does an ongoing Grooveshark dispute with Digital Music News. But Grooveshark may be running out of resources to fight its legal battles. CEO Sam Tarantino gave several interviews earlier this week crying poverty. "I am like literally broke." Tarantino told Mashable.