Pomplamoose YouTube Fortunes Fueled by iTunes Sales & Licensing Deals [VIDEO] - hypebot

« You've Got Their Attention... Now What? | Main | BandApp CEO & Bloodhound Gang Drummer Adam Perry On Why Bands Need Apps »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Ron Grant

It's crazy how much artists like Pompalamoose and Karmin have gotten such big followings off of their covers on places like YouTube and Vimeo. Just goes to show how much the music biz is changing at such a rapid pace, because both groups are probably outselling a lot of standard artists in this day and age. Another great piece on Hypebot. Thanks!

Shrimpy Z

Use what ya got I guess. If you're not a hot piece of ass, sing someone else's songs to get attention - and pray that people will care about your original stuff down the line. Anyone ever seen someone wearing a Pomplamoose T-shirt?

Jeff MacDougall

Not only have I seen one, I own one.

Voyno

Andrew Keen is the WORST!

Martin Blasick

Pomplamoose cheerfully rise above the bad vibes of the host. I love their covers but have purchased their originals.

Clyde Smith

I know he's done some things that got a lot of attention but I still don't understand why he's doing these videos for TechCrunch.

It's kind of funny given his attack on amateurs.

d

how do they get clearance to post the videos on youtube for covers of popular songs?

james

thats really pretty cool. They have done an amazing job with using youtube and showing us whats possible for independent artists in their home studio, I thought the host was kinda bad, but they weren't really great interviews either.

Maybe some better questions, and more prepared answers could give us some better insight tho. All things considered, it is the HOSTS job to draw those out...

Henry

The Web Sheriff just killed one of my covers of Brian Adams’ song on youtube. I got a threat of my youtube account to be deleted for copy rights infringements. So, how do they get clearance to post safely the videos on youtube?

Suzanne Lainson

I've wondering that too, and they haven't explained it. They have said that they use Harry Fox, but that has only been for the mechanical licensing for their recorded songs. They have never said they have obtained synch licenses, and I suspect they haven't.

YouTube says that partners are supposed to only upload original songs, and yet YouTube has heavily promoted Pomplamoose. YouTube says you need to have permission from all copyright holders, and yet doesn't explain how Pomplamoose has obtained permission.

I wish both Pomplamoose and YouTube would provide more info to other musicians wanting to cover songs.

Clyde Smith

This post of mine has a bit more info:
http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2012/01/walk-off-the-earth-cover-songs-music-videos.html

It seems to be a complicated pain to deal with. If anyone finds any company that does a good job of facilitating this process, I'd love to hear about it.

Suzanne Lainson

Actually, a lot of people have been referencing my blog post on this.

http://brandsplusmusic.blogspot.com/2010/08/music-copyright-and-youtube.html

YouTube has recently cut a deal with publishers, which is supposed to be administered by Harry Fox, but there has been no explanation as of yet whether musicians are now free to upload cover songs without a problem. This is all that has been posted so far and it is directed to publishers, not to musicians.

http://rightsflow.com/2012/01/youtube-and-rightsflow-opt-in-reminder/

Patrick Landreville

Harry Fox administers mechanical not sync licences. To obtain a sync licence one must contact the publisher or copyright holder directly. This must be done for each individual song. Videos require a sync licence. The Harry Fox mechanical licence will suffice for CDs, vinyl, tape or downloads only. If a publisher is not affiliated with the Harry Fox Agency they may be affiliated with the American Mechanical Rights Agency (AMRA) which does handle sync rights as well as mechanicals. Videos posted without obtaining sync rights are clearly liable for infringement. One can find the publishers or composers of songs through www.ascap.com or www.bmi.com. or www.amermechrights.com

Clyde Smith

Unless YouTube gets an agreement with every publisher for every song they're never going to be able to give blanket approval for cover songs uploaded to YouTube.

That's unlikely to occur across the board.

It would be nice if they gave you a list of acceptable songs but that's not going to happen either.

As long as music publishers can't all agree on a process for clearing cover usage in videos and someone steps in and provides that process, which they'd already be doing if it was reasonably straightforward, it's unlikely to ever get easier across the board.

Clyde Smith

Thank you, this is coming up enough that I need to get more familiar with who one contacts to pursue this possibility.

But your explanation certainly speaks to the complexity of this particular piece of the puzzle.

It would be nice if a company would try to tackle this problem but as long as plenty of funding is available for easier businesses, I'd be surprised to see that happening anytime soone.

Still, it's becoming such a popular thing, you'd think someone could find an easier solution.

Patrick Landreville

The YouTube deal administered by Harry Fox Agency is for mechanical licences. It deals with audio only postings on YouTube. Once someone syncs that audio to images they will need a separate synchronisation (sync) licence.
Musicians wishing to record covers need to obtain a Harry Fox Agency (HFA) or American Mechanical Rights Agency (AMRA) licence prior to recording the material. See www.songfile.com for available songs at HFA.

Patrick Landreville: Bald Ego Music
(ASCAP) (NMPA/HFA)

Suzanne Lainson

I'm very familiar with the different types of licensing. But YouTube has been touting its new agreement with publishers.

(1) There doesn't need to be a new agreement concerning mechanical rights because it's already available through Harry Fox.

(2) And YouTube has agreements with the performing rights organizations so musicians don't need to worry about those, either.

(3) So the implication is that YouTube is offering something that fills in a hole applicable to YouTube, which would be synch rights. If you can submit a video to YouTube, it gets run through YouTube's Content ID, and you are immediately told the video is okay or you need to pay a certain fee to publishers/songwriters, that would make life much less complicated. However, YouTube hasn't really said it's offering that service. I don't know what service it IS offering.

http://rightsflow.com/2012/01/youtube-and-rightsflow-opt-in-reminder/

Clyde Smith

Suzanne, it's a business model issue.

YouTube is helping publishers monetize unlicensed behavior. That's the service they're offering.

It doesn't directly involve the people posting the videos except to allow them to stay up and to add advertising which does not go to the person uploading videos without a license.

That also helps YouTube make a case for their willingness to work with rights holders even given the fact that they built much of that business knowingly with the use of content in violation of copyright laws.

It fits their business model to offer this services to publishers because it's possible to scale it using automated id processes.

It's very difficult to scale a process that involves negotiations with all sorts of people that you have to look up in databases.

That said, you're absolutely right that Google could create a process like you describe to at least reveal what titles are available for use in videos under this program. That would actually make sense cause it could conceivably spur more cover song activity on YouTube.

"or you need to pay a certain fee to publishers/songwriters"

That's the part that's too complicated and doesn't scale at this stage.

However, I just found out about rightclearing which is attempting to address this particular licensing issue so they're probably worth checking out:

http://www.sonicscoop.com/2012/02/23/restorm-launches-rightclearing-automated-music-licensing-service-at-social-music-summit-nyc/

Suzanne Lainson

Getting back to Pomplamoose. YouTube touts them as a great example of using covers to boost your career. But nowhere have I read that they have obtained synch licenses.

It's a big grey area. On the one hand we are told how taping you performing covers on YouTube will help you. But on the other hand, nothing is said about obtaining licenses.

Look at this article. It seems to suggest that RightsFlow will work for synch licenses.

How Karmin & Other Viral Stars Turn YouTube Covers Into Major Label Deals | Billboard.com: Online synch rights have improved in recent years thanks to YouTube's Content ID system that identifies uploaded songs and its settlement with music publishers on synch royalties. In December, the streaming service acquired RightsFlow to assist with licensing music tracked by the system by taking a song's digital fingerprint and allocating a slice of ad revenue to copyright holders.

Clyde Smith

I hear you. I'm trying to get up to speed on the topic since people are asking and I'd like to be able to respond with more details.

But I don't have to do that, I probably won't get much thanks for it and it actually doesn't fit the business model of any writer except one who's going to specialize in such details and then find better ways to monetize them than blogging part-time.

To be honest, it's not like I'm going to tell people how to do any of the rest of it either:
no singing lessons
no guitar lessons
no videotaping lessons

I'm not doing those and neither will Billboard!

That said, I understand your frustration with this situation.

Jimmy

This whole thing is bizzare. Here the owners of copy right are barely hanging on. SOPA is shot down. Then along come a couple of kids who could not have possibly afforded let alone negotiate a deal for sync licenses. They commit a crime then profit from it. And they steal those profits from fellow artists. If it weren't for cover songs illegally uploaded, Nat would be working in a call center and Jack would be a plumber in a wedding band on the side. Nothing funnier than true life.

Suzanne Lainson

Clyde, I'm not expecting you to have the answer. I've researched it all quite a bit. I think it's up to YouTube to better explain how the system works.

Clyde Smith

I see what you mean.

Jingle Covers

it's a great hustle.

The comments to this entry are closed.






SEARCH HYPEBOT

Musician & Music Industry Resources