_________________________________
Guest post by Bobby Owsinski of Music 3.0It’s been a fact of life in the recorded music business that the records known as “frontline” releases get all the attention. The big marketing dollars, the promotion, and any sales push is reserved for only the latest releases, and that attention changes pretty quickly on to the next new one unless it’s a big hit. Even big hits have a finite lifespan in the eyes of the record label though, as after 18 months they’re relegated to what’s known as “catalog,” which are then handled by a different team within the label.The problem here is that while this strategy might have worked back in the days of physical sales, it’s definitely not working in our current age of streaming.Many releases actually grow in terms of number of streams during year two of their lives and beyond, and hits of the past still pick up a huge number of streams as well.That begs the question – are the Billboard charts accurate if they only deal with current frontline releases and ignore songs and albums that have been around for awhile?Are Catalog Releases Making The Music Charts Inaccurate?
When it comes to measuring album success, it has long been a practice to focus only on the 'frontline' releases, with music being relegated to a label's 'catalog' after eighteen. Continue reading [https://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2017/12/are-catalog-releases-making-the-charts-innacurate.html]