By Michael J. Morgan, Founder of The Business of Mixing
Artists have to choose a mixing engineer before they can know many of the things that will determine whether working together actually goes well.
They can listen to your discography. They can read your credits. They can ask a producer who has worked with you before. But they cannot hear the mix you are going to make for them.
They don't know how you'll respond when they say the first version isn't right. They don't know whether you'll understand a note like “the chorus doesn't lift.” They don't know how you'll handle disagreement, uncertainty, or all the small moments between sending the files and approving the final mix.
And yet they still have to choose. That gap is what trust is actually for.
Something you can put weight on.
There is a useful distinction between trust and entrust. Trust is a judgment. Entrusting is an action. An artist can think you're talented, respected, and trustworthy without ever sending you a record. Eventually, they have to move from evaluating you to placing something valuable in your care.
In the framework I teach mixers through The Business of Mixing, I group the evidence artists use to make that decision into three kinds of trust signals: technical, emotional and social.
Artists probably aren't consciously sorting mixers into those categories. But they are reading the signals.
Technical trust: Can you carry the work?
Technical trust is the artist's belief that your ability, judgment and process can produce what this particular record needs. Your mixes are technical signals. So are your credits, taste, genre fluency, consistency, process and the way you talk about the work.
But technical trust is not quite the same as technical skill.
An artist can know you are an exceptional mixer and still wonder whether you are the right mixer for them. A brilliant discography dominated by aggressive metal records is real evidence of ability. To an artist making hazy bedroom pop, it may still leave the important question unanswered. Not, “Are they any good?” But rather, “Are they good for this?”
I once spoke with a mixer whose credits had accumulated billions of streams. The records were real. The skill was obvious. And yet the amount of work those credits generated did not reflect the scale of the credits themselves. More proof that this person could mix was not necessarily what was missing.
You can prove you're excellent without helping a particular artist understand why you're right for their record.
Emotional trust: Can I safely tell you the truth?
Emotional trust does not mean an artist thinks you're nice. It means they believe they can communicate honestly with you when things become subjective, uncertain or uncomfortable.
- What if they hate the first mix?
- What if they can't explain why?
- What if the thing they loved about the rough disappears?
- What if they ask for something you think is a bad idea?
- What if they change their mind?
A few years ago, I spoke with an artist who had spent more than fifteen years working in studios. She told me she had usually been too timid to say what she really thought about her own music.
Then a mix came back that she didn't like. This time, she said something. She told the mixer they needed to be honest with each other. He told her that was exactly what he wanted, because finding out months later that she had been unhappy would be far worse.
She described that conversation as crucial to everything that followed. She wasn't simply finding out whether he accepted revisions. She was finding out whether honesty was safe. No portfolio or credit could have answered that beforehand.
Most artists know the mixer has expertise they don't have. That can create its own pressure. An artist can dislike something and simultaneously wonder whether they're wrong. They may soften a note because they don't want to offend you. They may struggle to describe what they're hearing.
- “The chorus doesn't lift.”
- “It feels too clean.”
- “Can it sound more purple?”
To an engineer, those notes may sound imprecise. To the artist, they may be the most precise language available for something they know is wrong. Part of emotional trust is believing they can give you that information without becoming a mix engineer first.
Artists also cannot experience your intentions. They experience your behavior. You may know an unfinished mix is heading somewhere great. The artist only knows what came out of the speakers. You may know you haven't replied because you've been buried in work. The artist experiences silence. You may think a short email is efficient. The artist may experience irritation.
Whether you intend it or not, every interaction becomes another signal.
+Read more: "What a Grammy FYC Campaign Actually Looks Like If You're Independent"
Social trust: Who else has put weight on you?
Artists don't only look at you. They look around you. Who else has trusted this person?
Credits are social signals. So are referrals, testimonials, repeat clients, producers, managers, and reputation. But not all social trust works the same way. When a producer the artist already trusts says, “I've worked with her for ten years. Use her,” the signal is more immediate: “Someone I trust trusts this person.”
That is transferred trust. It can remove a tremendous amount of uncertainty. This is also why smaller experiences often lead to larger ones.
One artist I interviewed had already been around a mixer in the studio through a producer before hiring him to mix. Another sent one song before committing the rest of the project. A band had watched their producer work on an earlier session before relying on him more deeply later.
Nobody announced that they were running a trust test. They simply got to watch someone carry something smaller before giving them something bigger. A referral often does the same thing. Someone else has already put weight there.
How artists choose a mixing engineer: they read all three at once
An artist is really only thinking about the record they want to make. They get worried and will experience a growing sense of certainty or uncertainty. That's okay, it's incredibly common.
In the best case scenarios, they'll hear your work and recognize their musical world (technical signal), or their producer will recommend you (social signal), or you'll respond to their inquiry with a question that proves you actually listened to their demo material (emotional signal).
Throughout the process you can reinforce those signals by avoiding distance. If you clearly explain your timeline and revision process, that's a combination of technical and emotional signals. If then they question something in the first mix and you become defensive, emotional trust drops.
A credit is not trust. A testimonial is not trust. A great mix is not trust.
They are all signals.
The artist interprets those signals and decides how much weight to give them. That means a mixer can have enormous evidence in one category while leaving another almost completely unanswered.
I see this most often with technical trust. When work is slow, the instinct is often to produce more evidence of ability. Another portfolio update. Another before-and-after. Another credit. Another mix. Sometimes that's exactly what's missing.
But sometimes the artist already believes you can mix. The unanswered question is somewhere else:
- Will this person understand me?
- What will it feel like to work with them?
- Can I tell them when something isn't right?
- Does anyone I trust know them?
More technical evidence cannot solve every emotional or social trust problem. Price, availability and deadlines still matter. Producers, managers or labels may already have someone in mind. And none of this compensates for weak work.
Trust isn't the whole decision. But when an artist has uncertainty, they look for enough evidence to make the risk feel acceptable. Technical signals help them believe you can carry the work. Emotional signals help them believe they can be honest while you carry it. Social signals show them that other people have put weight there before.
Eventually, those signals become a decision. The artist stops evaluating you from a distance. They send the files.
Trust becomes entrusting.
Your job is not only to prove that you can make a great mix. It is to give an artist enough reason to put the weight of the record in your hands.
Michael J. Morgan is the Founder of The Business of Mixing, where he teaches freelance mix engineers how to build stronger, more sustainable businesses. He has worked one-on-one with more than 1,000 audio professionals and teaches on positioning, pricing, client relationships, and the business behind getting hired and rehired.
