“arbitrary and capricious”
Calling the reversal a “disaster,” he also dubbed the FCC’s order as “arbitrary and capricious,” adding that it violates basic stipulations laid out in the Administrative Procedure Act.“The FCC’s new rule fails to justify the commission’s departure from its longstanding policy and practice of defending net neutrality while misinterpreting and disregarding critical record evidence on industry practices and harm to consumers and businesses,” Schneiderman said Tuesday.Attorneys general from California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and the District of Columbia have added their names to the filing.The FCC, which took millions of comments from the public prior to making their decision, did not immediately return request for comment Tuesday.This is also not Schneiderman’s first run-in with the FCC over net neutrality.His office launched a 6-month investigation of the millions of comments the commission received in the run up to the December vote. Schneiderman determined at least 2 million comments submitted were sent by individuals posing as another person.Related articles





