Skip to content

The Pros And Cons Of Pandora’s Rdio Purchase

Pandora's recent procurement of the streaming service Rdio (it's second major acquisition of late, following Ticketfly) could help Pandora to expand its global customer base, but the purchase also brings with. Continue reading [https://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2015/11/the-pros-and-cons-of-pandoras-rd

4 (1)Pandora's recent procurement of the streaming service Rdio (it's second major acquisition of late, following Ticketfly) could help Pandora to expand its global customer base, but the purchase also brings with it a host of complications, and none of Rdio's customers or licenses.

_____________________________________

Guest Post by Bobby Owsinski on Music 3.0The music streaming wars just became a bit more interesting early this week when Pandora agreed to acquire some critical assets of the Rdio streaming service out of bankruptcy for a reported $75 million. This will the second strategic acquisition that Pandora has pulled off recently, following its $450 million purchase of Ticketfly a few months ago.On the surface this seems like it could be a huge positive for the company, but there are also a few potential land mines that come with the deal. Let’s look at the pros and cons.Pro: On-Demand Infrastructure Can Provide GrowthPandora is acquiring Rdio’s streaming technology (as well as some of its staff), which could be key to its global expansion. Right now the service is only available in the United States, and to a lesser degree, Australia and New Zealand. 8i0KbMrjA real problem for Pandora until now has been its ability to expand beyond those territories, mostly due to the company not being able to come to a suitable agreement with the licensing organizations in various countries (which all seem to favor on-demand streaming).The company is now more more likely to be able to grow, as having Rdio’s on-demand streaming infrastructure available as an integral part of the service not only makes for a more attractive package for the consumer, but may make it easier to gain approval to operate in other countries.Pro: The Public Prefer’s On-DemandGive Pandora credit, as it saw the writing on the wall that on-demand streaming would eventually become a clear winner with consumers over the radio-like non-interactive service that it currently provides.This was blatantly evident with Apple’s recent entry into the market with it’s on-demand Apple Music after only offering the Pandora competitor Apple Radio previously. You could see the trend in user numbers as well, as on-demand Spotify’s numbers continue to grow while Pandora’s have been relatively stagnant.Con: On-Demand Licensing Costs Are ConsiderableWhile that on-demand infrastructure is important, Pandora didn’t inherit any of Rdio’s roughly 1 million customers in [the] deal, mainly because it’s not buying the Rdio business itself. Maybe more importantly, it didn’t get any of its licenses with the record labels, which were non-transferable. That means that the company will need to negotiate these deals, which can be both costly and time-consuming. Read more on Forbes.

Related articles

REWIND – The New Music Industry's Week In Review: BMI – WMG – Spotify – Rdio – NPR – More
Apple Strong Arms Labels Ahead Of Music Relaunch, Dept. Of Justice Investigates
CD sales drop by 31% in the US
Pandora Acquires Bankrupt Rdio For $75 Million In Bid To Compete With Spotify, Apple Music – hypebot
Why the Major Labels Are the Streaming Wars' True Villains