_______________________________________
Responding to YouTube's announcement that it has paid $1 billion from ad revenue to the music industry in the last year, the IFPI responded (bold added):ANALYSIS: USAGE vs. USERS
The IFPI appears seems to have made it's $18 per user Spotify estimate by dividing the roughly $2 billion that the music streamer will pay the music industry and musicians in 2016 by its slightly more than 100 million active users. How they arrived at the stat that 800 million of YouTube's 1 billion monthly users actively listen to music which led to the "just over US$1 per user for the entire year" claim is less clear.
So while its easy argue that YouTube's music payments are far too low, it is not entirely useful to compare playing a few videos on YouTube to firing up several hour long playlists each day on Spotify.
Music royalty payments are calculated by usage nor users.
UPDATE: Responding to our inquiry on their source and use of data, John Blewett of the IFPI wrote:
The figure is based on our global music consumer research report, produced by Ipsos. It found that 82% of all YouTube users say they use the service for music. YouTube state they have “over a billion users” so the 800m is a conservative estimate. We also quoted the 800m figure in our Global Music Report this year – referencing research conducted by MIDiA.The comparison is between the revenue returned to rights owners per user from services such as Spotify, on one hand, and from YouTube on the other. This is an illustration of the impact of ‘Value Gap’.MORE: YouTube Has Paid Musicians, Music Industry $1 Billion In 12 Months vs $1.6 Billion From SpotifyRelated articles








